[Bug 725292] Review Request: s3fs-fuse - FUSE-based file system backed by Amazon S3

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725292



--- Comment #26 from Cott Lang <cott at internetstaff.com> ---
src rpm works flawlessly for me, as does s3fs-fuse. Thanks, Jorge!

However, I think having the binary named s3fs-fuse is going to confuse people,
since it will conflict with the documentation online as well as the man page
itself.

If removing the other package isn't palatable, can we stick with the original
binary name of s3fs and make this package conflict with the original s3fs
package?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component