[Bug 982204] Review Request: elm - The Elm language module
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Sep 13 05:48:51 UTC 2013
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> ---
Some more comments:
- Perhaps the Summary could be more descriptive.
How about: "Functional reactive web programming lanaguage"?
- Latest upstream version is now 0.9.0.2 though it needs union-find.
- You will probably have to ExcludeArch armv7hl for now since pandoc
refuses to build there currently with ghc-7.6.3 and llvm-3.3 (f20).
Hopefully that should improve in F21 when we move to ghc-7.8.
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #1)
> I think it might be better to call the package "Elm".
>
> At least cabal-rpm currently assumes that name = pkg_name
> for BinLib packages like this and it is also recommended
> in the Haskell Guidelines. (Failing that probably need to replace
> %{name} with %{pkg_name} in various places in the spec file.)
Well it seems to build and install okay here but I still
recommend using "Elm" since it is more consistent and
I think some of the haskell-sig script might get confused
if the package and hackage names are different.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tEfycInop5&a=cc_unsubscribe
More information about the package-review
mailing list