[Bug 1131284] Review Request: webkitgtk4 - GTK+ Web content engine library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131284

Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro at gnome.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(kalevlember at gmail
                   |                            |.com)



--- Comment #11 from Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro at gnome.org> ---
(In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #9)
> I believe we should be able to just state that:
> 
> License: LGPLv2

OK, that's indeed clear from the licensing FAQ.

It's less clear from the licensing guidelines at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios
which is why I got confused. Guess it's better for me to learn this in my first
review than later on!

> Where did you find BSD with advertising, by the way?

I didn't; I got three-clause confused with four-clause.

> If the combined work is under a single license (LGPLv2), I don't think we
> need to do this.

Yup.

> It seems to be already there for the -devel subpackage, or am I missing
> something?

Yes, it's clearly there. I did check the spec to make sure it was missing, but
I must have been very blind.

(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #10)
> Does libwebkit2gtkinjectedbundle.so need to be provided?

Good point. I was not sufficiently familiar with the rules for filtering
provides. It does need to be filtered; applications do not link to it directly.
So this and ANGLE are the only actual problems.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component