[Bug 1134835] Review Request: kissplice - Detection of various kinds of polymorphism in RNA-seq data

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835



--- Comment #10 from David Parsons <david.parsons at inria.fr> ---
Hi Christopher and thank you for adding your comments.

I had seen that point 1. (BR gcc-c++) wasn't needed but I thought it was
harmless so I had left it in. I will remove it.

For point 2. I'm wondering whether it is useful to target EPEL5 as well as
EPEL6. However, if EPEL5 is still being used, I suppose it would be best to
support it and hence keep the "rm -rf %{buildroot}" statement in the %install
section.

As for point 3. I had read this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Libexecdir (files in lib are
indeed "executable programs that are designed primarily to be run by other
programs rather than by users") but hadn't actually grasped that %{_libdir}
would be /usr/lib64 on X86_64.
I understand I have to change the install dir of these files. However I do not
know how to do this provided that upstream do not offer the possibility to
choose the lib dir. These files are consistently placed in
$prefix/lib/kissplice/ Can you help me with this ?

Thanks,
David

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component