[Bug 707993] Review Request: 9base - A port of various original Plan 9 tools for Unix

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Feb 16 16:35:48 UTC 2014


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707993

František Dvořák <valtri at civ.zcu.cz> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |valtri at civ.zcu.cz



--- Comment #10 from František Dvořák <valtri at civ.zcu.cz> ---
>From the discussion linked in comment #1, it seems the least controversial way
would be to rename all commands to have some suffix (like "plan9-")? It is
about 50 commands, so it won't look so nice, but it would follow FHS without
exceptions... Do I interpret it correctly? :-)

It is possible to add links (without prefix) to /usr/lib/plan9/. This would
allow users to use 9base directly by modifying PATH, and this would be even
compatible with Debian. 9base is not a library, so there shouldn't be a problem
with multilib IMHO.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component


More information about the package-review mailing list