[Bug 1062215] Review Request: perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny - A Tiny API client for MetaCPAN

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 25 14:54:26 UTC 2014


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062215

Petr Pisar <ppisar at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar <ppisar at redhat.com> ---
URL and Source0 are usable. Ok.
Source archive is original (SHA-256:
d43505879a0f1a476dccd8a2517e68d87b05ad473287c7788f8dbd6f8d3a9bbe). Ok.
Summary verified from lib/MetaCPAN/API/Tiny.pm. Ok.
Description verified from lib/MetaCPAN/API/Tiny.pm. Ok.
No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok.
License verified from LICENSE, README, lib/MetaCPAN/API/Tiny.pm. Ok.
All tests pass. Ok.

$ rpmlint perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny.spec
../SRPMS/perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny-1.131730-3.fc21.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny-1.131730-3.fc21.noarch.rpm
perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US se -> SE,
tie, es
perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US accessors
-> accessory, accessorizes, accessorize
perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US evals ->
vales, evils, ovals
perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eval ->
veal, vela, val
perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US TinyMocker
-> Tiny Mocker, Tiny-mocker, Tinkertoy
perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US se ->
SE, tie, es
perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
accessors -> accessory, accessorizes, accessorize
perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US evals ->
vales, evils, ovals
perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eval ->
veal, vela, val
perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
TinyMocker -> Tiny Mocker, Tiny-mocker, Tinkertoy
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.
rpmlint is Ok.

$ rpm -q -lv -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny-1.131730-3.fc21.noarch.rpm 
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Feb 25 15:46
/usr/share/doc/perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                      306 Jun 22  2013
/usr/share/doc/perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny/Changes
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                    18416 Jun 22  2013
/usr/share/doc/perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny/LICENSE
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                      327 Jun 22  2013
/usr/share/doc/perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny/README
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                     3458 Feb 25 15:46
/usr/share/man/man3/MetaCPAN::API::Tiny.3pm.gz
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Feb 25 15:46
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/MetaCPAN
drwxr-xr-x    2 root    root                        0 Feb 25 15:46
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/MetaCPAN/API
-rw-r--r--    1 root    root                    10893 Jun 22  2013
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/MetaCPAN/API/Tiny.pm
File layout and permissions are Ok.

$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny-1.131730-3.fc21.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq
-c
      1 perl(Carp)
      1 perl(HTTP::Tiny)
      1 perl(JSON::PP)
      1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.2)
      1 perl(strict)
      1 perl(warnings)
      1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
      1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
      1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
      1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
Binary requires are Ok.

$ rpm -q --provides -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny-1.131730-3.fc21.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq
-c
      1 perl(MetaCPAN::API::Tiny) = 1.131730
      1 perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny = 1.131730-3.fc21
Binary provides are Ok.

$ resolvedeps rawhide
../RPMS/noarch/perl-MetaCPAN-API-Tiny-1.131730-3.fc21.noarch.rpm 
Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok.

Package builds in F21
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6569488). Ok.

Package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.

Resolution: Package APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component


More information about the package-review mailing list