[Bug 1009446] Review Request: open-mtools - Tools for testing IP multicast

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009446



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar <ppisar at redhat.com> ---
> - license breakdown should be documented

Done. Updated package is on the same URL.

> - license text should be shipped with the tarball, can you
> contact upstream ?

License is shipped with the archive. See README.txt:

These tools are offered to the general public for any use without license.

  THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND INFORMATICA DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES
  EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
  NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
  PURPOSE.  INFORMATICA DOES NOT WARRANT THAT USE OF THE SOFTWARE WILL BE
  UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR-FREE.  INFORMATICA SHALL NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES,
  BE LIABLE TO LICENSEE FOR LOST PROFITS, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL OR
  INDIRECT DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE
  TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREUNDER, EVEN IF INFORMATICA HAS BEEN APPRISED OF
  THE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCH DAMAGES.

Other respective license texts (BSD) are quoted in each respective file.

> - I do not see where is the gpl v3 code in the License tag

Sorry. I had my own Makefile under GPLv3, but took it away, and forgot to
remove the license name from the spec file. Also fixed.

> in fact, the tarball do not correspond to the files on svn, where
there is udp.c in gpl v3.

LGPLv2+. However I do not package the upstream development tree. I package
released ZIP archive which does not contain the file yet.

Is it acceptable?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component