[Bug 1052852] Review Request: glite-lb-utils - gLite Logging and Bookkeeping auxiliary utilities

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052852



--- Comment #4 from František Dvořák <valtri at civ.zcu.cz> ---
Spec URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2/glite-lb-utils.spec
SRPM URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2/glite-lb-utils-2.3.10-2.fc21.src.rpm

> My first package review. I'll do my best :)

:-) Thanks for the review!

> ^--- I guess we can ignore these. At least to me there are no spelling
> mistakes and since gLite is the preferred way to spell it, we should not
> capitalize it.
> 

I agree.

> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/
> Guidelines#Man_pages
> "
> Man pages are the traditional method of getting help on a unix system.
> Packages should contain man pages for all binaries/scripts. If it doesn't,
> work with upstream to add them. Sometimes, other distributions (notably
> Debian), have man pages for programs. You can use those as a starting point.
> "
> 
> You should provide man pages for those binaries.

Man pages created.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component