[Bug 1091770] Review Request: ctlib - A fast generic C++ library for applied and computational topology

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091770



--- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net> ---
> I just wanted to put the subpackage there so I don't need to
> re-review later. Similar for examples.

Adding sub-packages doesn't need a re-review. You could push a simpler package
through review and add sub-packages once it's in Fedora dist git.


> I'm not sure what you mean here. What are you looking for this to say?

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package


> I wrote in every single header GPLv2 (or at your discretion, a later version).
> So GPLv3+ seems perfectly reasonable. If you'd like I can make it GPLv2+

If the source file headers say GPLv2+ and the COPYING file says GPLv3, that's
ambiguous - and GPLv3+ licensing doesn't permit the same things (such as
copying from GPLv2+ sources into a GPLv2 project).

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component