[Bug 1080583] Review Request: compat-qpid-cpp - Compatibility modules for Qpid

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080583



--- Comment #17 from Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #16)
> Hi Darryl, 
> 
> You might have missed the RbConfig part in the spec file. 
> 
> Also, could you also take a look at these as well please?
> 
> [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
>      Note: No known owner of /usr/libexec/qpid, /usr/lib64/qpid/client
> [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
>      Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/libexec/qpid,
>      /usr/lib64/qpid, /usr/lib64/qpid/client, /etc/rc.d, /etc/rc.d/init.d,
>      /usr/lib64/qpid/daemon
> 
> compat-qpid-cpp-client.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion qpid-cpp-client-ssl <=
> 0.24 obsoletes qpid-cpp-client-ssl = 0.24
> 
> compat-qpid-cpp-server-ha.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/qpidd-primary
> 
> compat-qpid-cpp-server-ha.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name
> qpidd-primary ('compat-qpid-cpp-server-ha', 'compat-qpid-cpp-server-had')

This is a non-issue: -ha is an acronym for "high availability".

> 
> As far as I can tell, we are close to getting this done ... Thanks!

No, my bad -- if you look the specfile there wasn't the updated one with
release 6. I forgot to upload the update. It addresses the issues.

That said, I've bumped the release to fix the above to directory problems. I
can't have compat-qpid-cpp own directories like /etc/rc.d/init.d or /etc/rc.d
so I'm not going to make this own them. The obsoletions were fixed in 6 as
well.

Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6846099
Updated spec:  http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp.spec
Updated SRPM: 
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp-0.24-7.fc20.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component