[Bug 855331] Review Request: tesla-polyglot - Modules to enable Maven usage in other JVM languages
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 23 10:56:31 UTC 2014
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855331
Michael Simacek <msimacek at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #18 from Michael Simacek <msimacek at redhat.com> ---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 122 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/msimacek/855331-tesla-
polyglot/licensecheck.txt
The files under MIT don't end up in binary RPM
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/maven-poms/tesla-polyglot, /usr/share
/maven-metadata
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/maven-poms/tesla-
polyglot, /usr/share/maven-metadata, /usr/share/java/tesla-polyglot
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 8 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is
pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: If package uses '-Dmaven.local.depmap' explain why it was needed in a
comment
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in tesla-
polyglot-atom , tesla-polyglot-cli , tesla-polyglot-clojure , tesla-
polyglot-common , tesla-polyglot-groovy , tesla-polyglot-maven-plugin ,
tesla-polyglot-javadoc
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
Java:
[x]: Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.)
[x]: Packages are noarch unless they use JNI
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: tesla-polyglot-0.1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
tesla-polyglot-atom-0.1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
tesla-polyglot-cli-0.1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
tesla-polyglot-clojure-0.1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
tesla-polyglot-common-0.1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
tesla-polyglot-groovy-0.1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
tesla-polyglot-maven-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
tesla-polyglot-javadoc-0.1.0-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
tesla-polyglot-0.1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
tesla-polyglot-atom.noarch: W: no-documentation
tesla-polyglot-cli.noarch: W: no-documentation
tesla-polyglot-clojure.noarch: W: no-documentation
tesla-polyglot-common.noarch: W: no-documentation
tesla-polyglot-groovy.noarch: W: no-documentation
tesla-polyglot-maven-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint tesla-polyglot-maven-plugin tesla-polyglot tesla-polyglot-clojure
tesla-polyglot-atom tesla-polyglot-cli tesla-polyglot-common
tesla-polyglot-groovy tesla-polyglot-javadoc
tesla-polyglot-maven-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
tesla-polyglot-clojure.noarch: W: no-documentation
tesla-polyglot-atom.noarch: W: no-documentation
tesla-polyglot-cli.noarch: W: no-documentation
tesla-polyglot-common.noarch: W: no-documentation
tesla-polyglot-groovy.noarch: W: no-documentation
8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires
--------
tesla-polyglot-maven-plugin (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
java-headless
jpackage-utils
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-common)
mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api)
tesla-polyglot (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
java-headless
jpackage-utils
mvn(org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-component-metadata)
tesla-polyglot-clojure (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
clojure-compat
java-headless
jpackage-utils
mvn(com.google.guava:guava)
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-common)
mvn(org.clojure:clojure)
tesla-polyglot-atom (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
java-headless
jpackage-utils
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-common)
tesla-polyglot-cli (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
java-headless
jpackage-utils
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-atom)
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-clojure)
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-common)
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-groovy)
mvn(org.apache.santuario:xmlsec)
tesla-polyglot-common (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
java-headless
jpackage-utils
mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-embedder)
mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-model-builder)
tesla-polyglot-groovy (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
java-headless
jpackage-utils
mvn(commons-logging:commons-logging)
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-common)
mvn(org.codehaus.groovy:groovy)
tesla-polyglot-javadoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
jpackage-utils
Provides
--------
Note: I ran it on the previous revision without the aliases
tesla-polyglot-maven-plugin:
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-maven-plugin)
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-maven-plugin:pom:)
tesla-polyglot-maven-plugin
tesla-polyglot:
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot:pom:)
tesla-polyglot
tesla-polyglot-clojure:
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-clojure)
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-clojure:pom:)
tesla-polyglot-clojure
tesla-polyglot-atom:
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-atom)
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-atom:pom:)
tesla-polyglot-atom
tesla-polyglot-cli:
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-cli)
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-cli:pom:)
tesla-polyglot-cli
tesla-polyglot-common:
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-common)
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-common:pom:)
tesla-polyglot-common
tesla-polyglot-groovy:
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-groovy)
mvn(io.tesla.polyglot:tesla-polyglot-groovy:pom:)
tesla-polyglot-groovy
tesla-polyglot-javadoc:
tesla-polyglot-javadoc
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/takari/maven-polyglot/archive/tesla-polyglot-0.1.0.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
78e86380f63fb960a610e56ab6594a1517ddc902d3a97f91cf165464d4e39a10
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
78e86380f63fb960a610e56ab6594a1517ddc902d3a97f91cf165464d4e39a10
Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 855331
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java
Disabled plugins: C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R,
PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG
Koji scratch-build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7932996
Approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
More information about the package-review
mailing list