[Bug 1287193] Review Request: letsencrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287193



--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek at in.waw.pl> ---
letsencrypt seem to be the best option. It matches the upstream URL, pypi
package name, executable name, and the python module name.

It seems only python2 is supported, although python3 is available [1]. So it
seems that python2 should be used for the binaries... Nevertheless,
python2-letsencrypt and python3-letsencrypt packages should be split out. This
will allow early adopters to easily test with python3 and easy the eventual
transition. Please follow the template [2]. The main package should Require:
python2-letsencrypt = %{version}.

[1] https://github.com/letsencrypt/letsencrypt/issues/962
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec_file

Requires: python2-dialog >= 3.3.0

The plan to support only manual mode in the beggining sounds reasonable,
although it would be really nice to integrate with Fedora apache config so that
the apache automatic mode works ootb.

Till, do you want to do the formal review, or should I?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component