[Bug 1131127] Review Request: safelease - legacy locking mechanism for VDSM

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127

Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(vdelima at redhat.co
                   |                            |m)



--- Comment #15 from Dan Kenigsberg <danken at redhat.com> ---
Once an independent safelease is available, Vdsm is going to require it, and
use the binary shipped by it in /usr/libexec/safelease. Until that happens,
vdsm would continue to contain its old implementation of safelease and run it
from the old location. Placing safelease binary on the same location is
counter-productive.

Vitor is responsible on getting this ticket resolved, now that Yoav is no
longer with us. Please sponsor him as the maintainer of the safelease package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component