[Bug 1242056] Review Request: rubygem-chake - serverless configuration management tool for chef

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242056



--- Comment #8 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade at gmail.com> ---
Hi Athos,

Sorry for the delay replying. I was very busy this week :)

A release bump is required even if not yet making an
official build. It is required, otherwise, it is very
to get confused. I personally asked this before, because
writing -0.1, -0.2 ... -0.3, and the -1 in final release
works, but a real bump was considered preferred.

You are doing very fine. But the 2 reviews were a bit too
weak. I suggest doing a review of some ruby related
package, so that you would better show your knowledge.

I believe it is almost done about review, but I will ask
you, to send an email to fedora-devel, or any ruby SIG,
for an explanation of the files
/usr/share/gems/doc/chake-0.7/rdoc/fonts/*.ttf
these files apparently are from
$ rpm -ql rubygem-rdoc|grep ttf
/usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/Lato-Light.ttf
/usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/Lato-LightItalic.ttf
/usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/Lato-Regular.ttf
/usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/Lato-RegularItalic.ttf
/usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/SourceCodePro-Bold.ttf
/usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/SourceCodePro-Regular.ttf

and there are several policies about fonts in fedora,
and these being duplicates is not good. See

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Package_layout_for_fonts

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component