[Bug 1177857] Review Request: libsedml - Library that fully supports SED-ML for SBML

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177857



--- Comment #17 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #16)
> ====== Questions/issues ======
> 
> python2-libsedml name is a violation of guidelines, imho. It should be
> python-libsedml.

You're right.

> 
> Why does java-libsedml require libsedml-devel? Shouldn't it be libsedml?

Neither of the two. I thought that Java library was linked to a library in
/usr/lib?; actually java provides an own 'libsbmlj.so' installed in /usr/lib?.
See
http://sbml.org/Software/libSBML/docs/cpp-api/libsbml-installation.html#locations 

> 
> > I'd use the same license and doc dirs for all subpackages: %global
> > _docdir_fmt %{name}.
> In particular, since every sub package has the same set of files, if a user
> installed all subpackages, and they wanted to look at the documentation,
> they would simply waste time before they realized that all the READMEs are
> identical.
> 

Done.

Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libSEDML/libsedml.spec
SRPM URL:
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libSEDML/libsedml-0.3.0-8.20150422git235bb5.fc22.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component