[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue May 26 14:36:02 UTC 2015 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564

Wolfgang Ulbrich <chat-to-me at raveit.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #64 from Wolfgang Ulbrich <chat-to-me at raveit.de> ---
APPROVED!

Only a minor issue after our conversation per irc and your fixed srpm.

[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/pixmaps/blueman

Please own directory before uploading to git.



This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are
also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla:
- Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such
  a list, create one.
- Add your own remarks to the template checks.
- Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not
  listed by fedora-review.
- Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this
  case you could also file a bug against fedora-review
- Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines
  in what you paste.
- Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint
  ones are mandatory, though)
- Remove this text



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
  Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/blueman
  See:
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL
     (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 109 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/rave/blueman/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/share/pixmaps/blueman
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/pixmaps/blueman

Please own directory before uploading to git.

[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: glib-compile-schemas is run in %postun and %posttrans if package has
     *.gschema.xml files.
     Note: gschema file(s) in blueman
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
     contains icons.
     Note: icons in blueman
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
     Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 4249600 bytes in /usr/share
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: blueman-2.0-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
          blueman-2.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
blueman.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bluetooth -> Bluetooth,
blue tooth, blue-tooth
blueman.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/blueman.desktop
blueman.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bluetooth -> Bluetooth,
blue tooth, blue-tooth
blueman.src:34: W: unversioned-explicit-provides dbus-bluez-pin-helper

dbus-bluez-pin-helper is a virtual provides

blueman.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://github.com/blueman-project/blueman/releases/download/2.0/
blueman-2.0.tar.xz HTTP Error 403: Forbidden

This is a false positve, download link is valid!

2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: blueman-debuginfo-2.0-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
blueman.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bluetooth -> Bluetooth,
blue tooth, blue-tooth
blueman.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/blueman.desktop
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.



Requires
--------
blueman (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /bin/sh
    /usr/bin/env
    PolicyKit-authentication-agent
    bluez
    config(blueman)
    dbus
    desktop-notification-daemon
    libbluetooth.so.3()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit)
    notify-python
    obexd
    pygobject3
    python(abi)
    python2
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
blueman:
    application()
    application(blueman-adapters.desktop)
    application(blueman-manager.desktop)
    blueman
    blueman(x86-64)
    config(blueman)
    dbus-bluez-pin-helper



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
blueman: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/_blueman.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/blueman-project/blueman/releases/download/2.0/blueman-2.0.tar.xz
:
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
81a5ca95124f12bfb62d2d2d0d265af70cdae1d43b0c6e4fc6d2bad8f82958f1
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
81a5ca95124f12bfb62d2d2d0d265af70cdae1d43b0c6e4fc6d2bad8f82958f1


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change: 2015-05-04
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -r -n blueman-2.0-1.fc20.src.rpm -m
fedora-22-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-22-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP,
Ruby
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

More information about the package-review mailing list