[Bug 1269649] Review Request: aeskulap - Full open source replacement for commercially available DICOM viewer

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269649



--- Comment #6 from Jens Lody <fedora at jenslody.de> ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5)
> # Note: upstream is dead, so patches can not be included in the original
> sources.
> # The source does not exist any longer on the old server, but can be
> downloaded via archive.org.
> # Is it allowed to do it this way ?
> 
> Why you don't upload your patched source code as new maintained project?

To be honest:
It just did not come in my mind, even if it would obviously be the simplest
solution.
This would obsolete all the patches, that clutter the spec-file now.

One question is, what to do with the naming in such a case, where upstream is
dead ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component