[Bug 1270357] Review Request: nacl-gcc - Various compilers (C, C++) for nacl

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357

Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rc040203 at freenet.de



--- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 at freenet.de> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #4)

> nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib64/libobjc.la
> nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
> /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib64/libsupc++.la
> nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
> /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib64/libstdc++.la
> nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
> /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib32/libstdc++.la
> nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib32/libobjc.la
> nacl-gcc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
> /usr/x86_64-nacl/lib32/libsupc++.la
> OK too. There's a rule against .la files, but a compiler is special.

Putting aside the fact that I do not see any sense in shipping these *.la's, 
the rpmlint warning typically means that these files carry bogus permissions
(Likely these are marked "executable" while they should not be).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component