[Fedora-packaging] Re: BuildRoot

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mardi 25 juillet 2006 à 22:52 +0200, Axel Thimm a écrit :

> But to come back to Ville's observation: It means that one shouldn't
> mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the same specfile, which
> hopefully noone is doing.

This part is already in the guidelines but you're the first to find a
reason why one is better/safer than the other.

IMHO that's reason enough to make %{buildroot} mandatory in Fedora specs
(will simplify the guidelines too). Hope the packaging dark cabinet is
reading this. 

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20060725/4d8b509c/attachment.bin