[Fedora-packaging] Broken dependency /bin/sh?
jkeating at redhat.com
Mon May 19 18:33:49 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 20:23 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> I believe it is somewhere else because a "grep -Ri broken *" on a cloned
> repository did not show the "Broken dependencies" subject that the mails
> should have. I want to suggest to add a check whether or not the amount of
> broken packages is sane, e.g. up to 100. And in case it is not, the script
> could add a note to the mail sent to fedora-devel and maybe releng or whover
> would have to take a look then or only skip the individual reports.
Gah, you're right. buildrawhide is in releng, but spam-o-matic comes
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20080519/d37466d5/attachment.bin
More information about the packaging