[Fedora-packaging] Request for confirmation: Which form is required for a review

[Matthias Runge]

On 08/02/12 20:51, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> Bottom line is that it isn't.  This turns into a nice argument every few
> years.

Thanks for your answers. It reads like there's no review documentation 
required. Asking for this leads to endless discussion, and probably to 
no result.
>
> In the past when I ran across one of these (i.e. back in the good old
> days when I actually read the entire package review mailing list) I'd
> double check and I pretty much always found something that was
> overlooked.  Opening a discussion about how the review was probably
> insufficient was usually enough.

In my earlier noted case, I should prove, the reviewer had something 
forgotten to check.

To be clear, imho there's no need to take back a granted review, the 
packager of the reviewed package knows his job well.

I think, a review generates work to do for the reviewer. Why one 
shouldn't see, how much, work or which results were found during this 
work. (even if it reads ... ok, ... ok, ... ).

-- 
Matthias Runge <mrunge at matthias-runge.de>
                <mrunge at fedoraproject.org>