[Fedora-packaging] Question regarding split of packages

[Matthias Runge]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/01/12 12:10, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hello,
I just stumbled upon this:

the plan is to separate the bacula-docs subpackage from bacula package
and create a new package bacula-docs.
(review request at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941 )

My question is, is the split possible in existing trees, e.g in F16?
This step doesn't introduce new features, so it shouldn't harm

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Stable_release_updates_vision

There's just the situation that bacula-docs is provided from earlier
bacula-package and also from bacula-docs. Would those two clash in
stable branches?

Thanks,
- -- 
Matthias Runge <mrunge at matthias-runge.de>
               <mrunge at fedoraproject.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPDVRJAAoJEOnz8qQwcaIW6ywH/jF+C/DLB+Q+cLQXQ87KokuU
bS2SPWuO3Z2UrX7oiNQHTJ5111sHvJETKL+WmQJQiE6HJus/GEerrIzGOICUYVjZ
Hzi+l4UqKlhpLTs/2tc6fJv5la+oGQgtuGaoDXnIaCz2igcuXEYMzJxNJS34sD8w
ZjgWz4fRtcyVD5u/x6CCVepHvnpDOZvRHsjaEPQOExTAKvkvvho6HBZu5m9oQtJq
9HrkkbyDMx+n2C162GXdwZt7cpW0/lIElQfnKttyQ8U8SMvjdy+nmYqpq0cf6fvB
U5/h7l2TV2JYsHxOYzM/uD/BXorT+C+shI7PL28vmzn8+gpopjsTPRPW2UAhakI=
=SlHy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----