[Fedora-packaging] Inconsistencies in Python package naming

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:09:15AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 08:31 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >Let's presume for the moment that splitting it out is
> >acceptable and talk more about the naming. In this situation, does
> >python-sssdconfig make the most sense as a subpackage name?
> 
> yes, imo, +1
> 
That would be my preference as well.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20130328/32235b5a/attachment-0001.sig>