[Fedora-packaging] Using SCLs for ROS releases vs simply dumping them into /opt/ros/$ros-release

[Ankur Sinha]

On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 17:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 01:51 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Bloom, the ROS generator system has recently gotten support to
> generate
> > rpms[1]. At the moment, the author is simply putting releases
> > into /opt/ros/$ros-release and isn't making use of SCLs. Is this OK,
> 
> No, this is not OK
> 
> > or
> > should they use SCLs?
> Neither.
> 
> The package should integrate into the system directories.

I'm afraid we can't provide users with multiple ros releases if we work
on this. Please read my other reply to the list.
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20140208/cb053fab/attachment.sig>