<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Ville Skyttä <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ville.skytta@iki.fi" target="_blank">ville.skytta@iki.fi</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Dave Johansen <<a href="mailto:davejohansen@gmail.com">davejohansen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Ok, that makes sense, but the part I'm confused about is that this isn't a<br>
> private library at all. It's /usr/lib64/libformat.so.1.1.0 and is intended<br>
> for use by other applications. So is there something wrong in the .so that's<br>
> causing rpmlint to think it's private?<br>
<br>
</span>My rpmlint-1.7-1.fc22.noarch on a x86_64 F22 box does not output that<br>
warning for your package in the first place.<br></blockquote></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">This warning is only showing up when running rpmlint on the installed package during fedora-review. The man package indicates that the set of checks done on installed binary packages is a superset of the one run on uninstalled binary package files.<br></div></div>