Review Request 20: Rework Logging Mechanisms

Martin Krizek fedoraqa.devel at gmail.com
Thu Apr 18 09:29:12 UTC 2013


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/20/#review21
-----------------------------------------------------------



blockerbugs/__init__.py
<http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/20/#comment38>

    Could you elaborate on why you use both root_logger and app.logger?



blockerbugs/__init__.py
<http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/20/#comment37>

    Why this is set on root_logger, while everywhere else it is set on specific handler?



blockerbugs/__init__.py
<http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/20/#comment36>

    s/handler/file_handler/



blockerbugs/cli.py
<http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/20/#comment39>

    There are a lot of commented out code in this file, probably delete it?


- Martin Krizek


On April 17, 2013, 5:22 p.m., Tim Flink wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/20/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 17, 2013, 5:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for blockerbugs.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 374
>     https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/374
> 
> 
> Repository: blockerbugs
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is code to rework logging mechanisms for fedora-infra standards. It changed a bit from martin's original code, so I'm creating a new review request.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   testing/test_updatesync_extract_information.py 1884dabb577515720c19b167a58fdb0559ba273c 
>   testing/test_update_sync.py 1bc7b7c9d43bb0f526611aef872ace85918fc3ad 
>   sass/app.scss 0f81cbd6d740ff7325ec080c5ccb33ecf642e0b7 
>   runapp.py 736ec65bd25962180559d783a155c7ac1c5da285 
>   conf/settings.py.example 7c45c785fa05c12f2c36f2ca06b99bcd41b318ce 
>   conf/blockerbugs.cron.example ddfe8f5661854e76887cd727f187f219c80ffdae 
>   blockerbugs/util/update_sync.py f6469da84ce9e60d65521535a07fe511fa668e1e 
>   blockerbugs/util/bz_interface.py 7dedce924c2f96110ed98bd311b870e03e617887 
>   blockerbugs/util/bug_sync.py 6e092aa35c04ec9a7a4b03653fddf2cef27e4ba1 
>   blockerbugs/templates/thanks.html f5432900daae6af4d22b3e5abbbc7092df868c4a 
>   blockerbugs/templates/layout.html a0b5ebda3ff61a3fa2647d96ef77037ed0d729d2 
>   blockerbugs/static/img/repeater-stg.png 24c56fd10da38d7d6f8a3f684a811bc4b04b56a4 
>   blockerbugs/static/img/blockerbugs-logo-light-stg.png b94f3891dd4726eac435c8a03c2ac0a2daafef39 
>   blockerbugs/static/css/app.css 26e177c1e5c7cec716db5b2bcd428bb4e6a92505 
>   blockerbugs/static/css/app-foundation.css 852272bf1bd1c629b30933b451daceec31812de7 
>   blockerbugs/config.py cecca7c88ef25ee9fd81df0cd2aeb2f84030559f 
>   blockerbugs/cli.py 0166b0fddcacc79c81f0f111317df6208c35fb12 
>   blockerbugs/__init__.py cf068ed33799a5426e297ab9ed269c513079f726 
>   blockerbugs.spec 012e980b5d0cf57c09bd9f993b6c21d29c5cc3d8 
> 
> Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/20/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> local and dev VM testing, currently running on qa.stg.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ - no issues noticed thus far
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tim Flink
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/qa-devel/attachments/20130418/c80969a3/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the qa-devel mailing list