Review Request 55: milestone_info uses hardcoded bugzilla url instead of using config value

[Martin Krizek]

On Oct. 14, 2013, 5:08 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote:
> > Overall, looks good other than my question about url munging vs. changing how the settings are done. Thoughts?

I updated the diff according to conversation on IRC.


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/55/#review114
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 11, 2013, 11:01 a.m., Martin Krizek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/55/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 11, 2013, 11:01 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for blockerbugs.
> 
> 
> Bugs: t423
>     https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/t423
> 
> 
> Repository: blockerbugs
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> commit ddcd87dcda42b9ee17000cdac0251b0b3a7f3e28
> Author: Martin Krizek <mkrizek at redhat.com>
> Date:   Fri Oct 11 12:49:54 2013 +0200
> 
>     Don't use hardcoded bz url in the milestone_info template
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   blockerbugs/templates/milestone_info.html bac8fa075ef4fd40c95fb35885951845d483b521 
>   blockerbugs/controllers/main.py 5619a834b4d613398bac2cc196a1a71457af30f2 
> 
> Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/55/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I tested it on my local machine.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Krizek
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/qa-devel/attachments/20131016/a5ef4def/attachment.html>