Project Locations and Basic Setup

Kamil Paral kparal at redhat.com
Tue Apr 8 12:33:03 UTC 2014


> I think most of this came up in an earlier thread but I'm not finding it
> right now, so I'm starting a new one.
> 
> I'm proposing that we make all the taskotron-related projects as
> similar as we can with regard to git repo setup, location and how we do
> reviews. If we keep them all slightly different, it makes asking for
> contributions more difficult and the contributions guide (which still
> needs to be written :-/) more complicated.
> 
> To be specific, the repos that I'm including in this are:
>  - libtaskotron
>  - taskotron-trigger
>  - resultsdb
>  - resultsdb_frontend
>  - resultsdb_api
>  - pytap13
>  - fake_fedorainfra
> 
> The settings that I'm proposing for all those repos are:
> 
>  - use gitflow and set 'develop' as the default branch
>  - host projects under bitbucket/fedoraqa
>    * makes it easier to say "find our projects at this url" instead of
>      "find projects X,Y and Z here. find A and B here"
>  - code submissions and issues/tasks are tracked through phabricator
> 
> Any objections to doing this to all the repos I mentioned?

Almost no objections :-)

For pytap13, I think it would make sense to keep the issues in Bitbucket. Once the library is complete, we won't touch it too much, it's just a utility library with a very narrow scope. In this case, I think it would be better to keep the issue tracker more accessible (people are much more likely to create a Bitbucket account than our Phab account).


More information about the qa-devel mailing list