[Fedora-r-devel-list] Re: Plans for R-2.7.0?
Alex Lancaster
alexl at users.sourceforge.net
Tue May 13 09:49:16 UTC 2008
>>>>> "TC" == Tom \"spot\" Callaway writes:
TC> On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 02:56 -0700, Alex Lancaster wrote:
>> I agree, wait for F-9. Then we can put it through updates-testing,
>> have time to push dependent packages that might need rebuilding,
>> including (but probably not limited to) rpy.
>>
>> Meanwhile we could push versions for F-7 & F-8 to updates-testing
>> to shake out potential problems. Then push them all to stable
>> after F-9 is released.
TC> Ehhh, i don't want to break the upgrade path. We'll just sit on
TC> this until after F-9.
I just noticed that some packages fail to rebuild with R 2.7.0, e.g.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=606646
the build.log has the following:
checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/var/tmp/R-zoo-1.5-3.fc10-root-mockbuild
error:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/R/library/zoo/NEWS
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/R/library/zoo/NEWS
Does 2.7.0 somehow attempt to compile/provide a NEWS file even if the
actual package does not?
Alex
More information about the r-devel
mailing list