F10 packages for the firefox security update

[Christopher Aillon]

Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 15:37 -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> Needing to be tagged for F10 final are:
>>
>> xulrunner-1.9.0.4-1.fc10
>> firefox-3.0.4-1.fc10
>> seamonkey-1.1.13-1.fc10
>> epiphany-2.24.1-2.fc10
>> epiphany-extensions-2.24.0-2.fc10
>> azureus-3.0.4.2-18.fc10
>> blam-1.8.5-4.fc10
>> devhelp-0.21-3.fc10
>> evolution-rss-0.1.1-4.fc10
>> galeon-2.0.7-3.fc10
>> gecko-sharp2-0.13-2.fc10
>> gnome-python2-extras-2.19.1-24.fc10
>> gnome-web-photo-0.3-12.fc10
>> google-gadgets-0.10.1-5.fc10
>> kazehakase-0.5.6-1.fc10.1
>> Miro-1.2.7-2.fc10
>> mozvoikko-0.9.5-4.fc10
>> mugshot-1.2.2-3.fc10
>> pcmanx-gtk2-0.3.8-3.fc10
>> ruby-gnome2-0.18.0-2.fc10
>> yelp-2.24.0-3.fc10
>
> I hate to ask this, but how much testing has these packages gotten?

I get embargoed source code 10-14 days in advance that I've been running 
local builds with for xulrunner, firefox, seamonkey, epiphany, mugshot, 
devhelp, and yelp, and the equivalent RHEL builds have had ample 
testing.  And of course, Mozilla upstream's test process makes 
everything else look completely untested by comparison.

But because we have no way of doing embargoes in Fedora land, almost all 
testing has been on builds that are not these exact bits since I could 
not do anything in Fedora until last night.  I am running F-10 though, 
so they have slightly more testing post-build than the F-8 and F-9 
builds which are going out.