#1881: Bad signature on eclipse-nls-da in F11 updates repo
Fedora Release Engineering
rel-eng at fedoraproject.org
Tue May 26 16:27:45 UTC 2009
#1881: Bad signature on eclipse-nls-da in F11 updates repo
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: pghmcfc | Owner: rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org
Type: task | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: mash
Resolution: | Keywords:
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by pghmcfc):
Just tried it again from work and it failed again:
{{{
$ rpm -vK eclipse-nls-da-3.4.0.v20090423085802-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
eclipse-nls-da-3.4.0.v20090423085802-1.fc11.noarch.rpm:
Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: BAD, key ID d22e77f2
Header SHA1 digest: OK (95f13b675653661ed7307e483ac5a40e2da43412)
V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: OK, key ID d22e77f2
MD5 digest: OK (cdf308c1f4ed68d2be00ddd93c9b19ad)
}}}
Now what may be different between yours and my cases are that I'm
downloading/checking on F-10 plus updates whereas perhaps you're on
Rawhide? Might the rpm differences account for this? But why would only
this package be affected? No such problem with the -de package:
{{{
$ rpm -vK eclipse-nls-de-3.4.0.v20090423085802-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
eclipse-nls-de-3.4.0.v20090423085802-1.fc11.noarch.rpm:
Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: OK, key ID d22e77f2
Header SHA1 digest: OK (4d7460dfd10d3347934956f4265cb45417dc6274)
V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: OK, key ID d22e77f2
MD5 digest: OK (406d1a9380f0c262914727f6c20244a3)
}}}
I discovered the problem (if indeed it is a problem) when running reposync
on the F-11 updates repo, using F-10 at home and the same problem
manifested on CentOS 5 at work (with Seth's python-hashlib installed).
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1881#comment:2>
Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng>
Release Engineering for the Fedora Project
More information about the rel-eng
mailing list