Fwd: F13 Schedule Proposal--please RESPOND
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Tue Nov 3 18:29:37 UTC 2009
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 12:51:43PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> John Poelstra (poelstra at redhat.com) said:
> > I'm following the methodology described here:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle
>
> If it's wrong, 'we should update the methodology'. You asked for feedback
> on the schedule, not the methodology.
>
> Was this methodology ever posted in a FESCo or rel-eng meeting for public
> review by the stakeholders? I don't recall it, but I could be wrong. So,
> it really shouldn't be surprising that other people are surprised by the
> output of this new methodology, when that output doesn't actually appear
> to match what we've previously done.
IIRC that page consolidates previous written work from previously
existing pages, and the comments of rel-eng personnel. Is it really
new, or the same information presented in a different format that
makes it look new?
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
More information about the rel-eng
mailing list