[Fedora Robotics] ROS Fuerte

[Rich Mattes]

On 05/29/2012 11:00 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 06:34 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
> They are, but the Requires have the %{codename} macro in them (where
> appropriate), because we'll want people to not update half of a ros
> deployment.
>
That's true.  I guess locking dependencies to rosdistro name is a lot 
easier than doing package versions.
> http://spot.fedorapeople.org/ros/

Great!
> I didn't get as much time as I'd have liked to try PCL today. I did pull
> the source from trunk and make a test package with it, the results are
> as follows:
>
> A normal build of PCL from trunk has the same ROS perception_pcl
> compilation issues as the stock 1.5.1 build of PCL. When I built PCL
> from trunk with -DUSE_ROS=ON, it has the same issues as when I do the
> -DUSE_ROS=ON build of PCL 1.5.1 (specifically, it can't find headers).
>
> The Ubuntu dpkg has custom ROS headers which replace the missing PCL
> headers, but I'm reluctant to just chunk them in place, because I don't
> know if there is other non-header ROS specific  codechanges that I'd
> need. Tim, do you know how to build the magic "ROS" PCL? :)

I believe I found the repository for the "ROS" pcl:

https://github.com/wg-debs/pcl

This tree includes the ModelCoefficients and friends that are missing 
from upstream pcl.

Rich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/robotics/attachments/20120529/c8e3d977/attachment.html>