<div><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kanarip@kanarip.com">kanarip@kanarip.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:47:33 -0500, Jason Guiditta<br>
<<a href="mailto:jason.guiditta@gmail.com">jason.guiditta@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I am running Fedora 12 with Rails 2.3.4 installed. Everything was<br>
working<br>
> fine, then last night I got an update from yum for Rack 1.1. After<br>
> installing that, my working rails apps failed to load. Creating a new<br>
test<br>
> app yielded:<br>
> /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:827:in `report_activate_error':<br>
> RubyGem version error: rack(1.1.0 not ~> 1.0.0) (Gem::LoadError)<br>
><br>
> Has anyone else hit this issue? If more detail is needed, let me know.<br>
> Thanks,<br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div>I've seen this issue occur once or twice, but I'm not all too well versed<br>
in Ruby... is ~> even a valid comparison and if so, what does it imply<br>
exactly? I'm afraid this should have been '=>', which would require a patch<br>
on the rails stack.<br>
<br>
-- Jeroen<br><br></blockquote><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div>Good call, '=~' is valid, but '~>' does not appear to be, according to the list here:<div><a href="http://www.ruby-doc.org/docs/ProgrammingRuby/language.html#table_18.4">http://www.ruby-doc.org/docs/ProgrammingRuby/language.html#table_18.4</a></div>
</div></div>