<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 11/30/2011 06:46 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+_jt2ZQUjJ3nNNt=rJjoEeYUHEwOsr9OHb-8685VSigxWzj4A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Emanuel
Rietveld <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:codehotter@gmail.com">codehotter@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Could somebody please review my rails 2.3 packages? I can do a
review swap.<br>
<br>
(...)<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig"
target="_blank"></a></blockquote>
<div><br>
This is awesome. I'll try to hit these up tomorrow if I can
get a chance. Any chance you'd be willing to put these in
EPEL 6 too?<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I would be willing to put them in EPEL 6, but I'm not sure if I
would still be willing to support rails 2.3 two years from now, let
alone six. Is putting a package into EPEL 6 a commitment to support
it for the entire lifecycle of EPEL 6? If so, would you be willing
to co-maintain the packages and take over when I lose interest in
rails 2.3? (this will be when all the projects I care about have
moved on to rails 3)<br>
<br>
Also, does putting rails 2.3 in EPEL 6 automatically imply that
rails 3 will not go into EPEL 6?<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
</body>
</html>