<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 01/04/2012 11:19 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4F047C04.8070709@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
Dne 4.1.2012 16:31, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
<blockquote cite="mid:4F0470E3.9050909@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
On 01/02/2012 08:55 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:8909abdb-b305-4554-9cd7-a67ddc655c5b@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi guys,
thank you all for your comments. I updated the guidelines draft to reflect them:</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Again thanks for the new guidelines. Just a couple more comments
inline below<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:8909abdb-b305-4554-9cd7-a67ddc655c5b@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">- BR: ruby is now replaced with BR: ruby-devel for Ruby packages.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Possible duplication / discrepancy:<br>
<br>
- In 'Ruby Packaging Guidelines':<br>
"Ruby packages <b>must</b> require ruby-devel package at build
time with a <code>BuildRequires: ruby-devel</code>, and <b>may</b>
indicate the minimal ruby version they need for building."<br>
<br>
- In 'Build Architecture and File Placement':<br>
"All non-gem ruby packages <b>must</b> require ruby-devel
package at build time with a <code>BuildRequires: ruby-devel</code>.
"<br>
<br>
<br>
Which should it be, 'all' ruby packages or just 'non-gem' ruby
packages. Most likely the former, so for simplicity sake, the
latter should be removed.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
The latter is correct, since gems requires rubygems-devel and that
should be enough for gems.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hrm? Don't see a rubygems-devel subpackage in the rubygems spec, is
this going to be updated as well to incorporate that?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:4F047C04.8070709@redhat.com" type="cite">
However, reading the guidelines again, I am not happy with the
structure. We have RubyGems section, but we don't have Non-gems
section. The "Build Architecture and File Placement" should be
probably 3rd level and we need some nice 2nd level caption. Any
idea?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Good idea, not sure as to the 2nd level though<br>
<br>
-Mo<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>