<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Dne 4.1.2012 23:02, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
<blockquote cite="mid:4F04CC74.4010902@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
On 01/04/2012 11:19 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4F047C04.8070709@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
Dne 4.1.2012 16:31, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
<blockquote cite="mid:4F0470E3.9050909@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
On 01/02/2012 08:55 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:8909abdb-b305-4554-9cd7-a67ddc655c5b@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi guys,
thank you all for your comments. I updated the guidelines draft to reflect them:</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Again thanks for the new guidelines. Just a couple more
comments inline below<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:8909abdb-b305-4554-9cd7-a67ddc655c5b@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">- BR: ruby is now replaced with BR: ruby-devel for Ruby packages.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Possible duplication / discrepancy:<br>
<br>
- In 'Ruby Packaging Guidelines':<br>
"Ruby packages <b>must</b> require ruby-devel package at
build time with a <code>BuildRequires: ruby-devel</code>, and
<b>may</b> indicate the minimal ruby version they need for
building."<br>
<br>
- In 'Build Architecture and File Placement':<br>
"All non-gem ruby packages <b>must</b> require ruby-devel
package at build time with a <code>BuildRequires: ruby-devel</code>.
"<br>
<br>
<br>
Which should it be, 'all' ruby packages or just 'non-gem' ruby
packages. Most likely the former, so for simplicity sake, the
latter should be removed.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
The latter is correct, since gems requires rubygems-devel and
that should be enough for gems.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hrm? Don't see a rubygems-devel subpackage in the rubygems spec,
is this going to be updated as well to incorporate that?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
RubyGems are currently build from ruby.spec. The independent
rubygems.spec, which will allows to update RubyGems independently,
is work in progress.<br>
<br>
But if you check my testing repository, you'll see the
rubygems-devel package already.<br>
<br>
<br>
Vit<br>
</body>
</html>