<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dne 11.4.2013 14:00, Axilleas
Pipinellis napsal(a):<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5166A5F9.6040206@archlinux.gr" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt>On 04/11/2013 01:52 PM, Vít
Ondruch wrote:</tt><tt><br>
</tt></div>
<blockquote cite="mid:516695FB.7030009@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt>There are some of them already
undergoing review:</tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt><tt> awesome_print - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839650">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839650</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> backports - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816991">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816991</a></tt><tt>
- though I am not sure if we should continue with this one,
since it brings nothing new to Fedora</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> bootstrap-sass - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920436">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920436</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> faraday - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820063">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820063</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> rails_best_practices - </tt><tt><a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839649">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839649</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> ruby-progressbar - There is rubygem-progressbar,
which seems to be the same library: </tt><tt><a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642666">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642666</a></tt><tt>
there was also rubygem-ruby-progressbar review: </tt><tt><a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737551">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737551</a></tt><tt>
- Although this one was deferred, not sure if we should not
name the gem by upstream</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> spork - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588476">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588476</a></tt><tt>
- This was deferred</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> stringex - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728051">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728051</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> yajl-ruby - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823351">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823351</a></tt><tt>
- This is blocked by upstream a bit :/</tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt></div>
</blockquote>
<tt>Are these listed somewhere, or you manually search for them?</tt><tt><br>
</tt></blockquote>
<br>
<tt>I have saved query in BZ for rubygem- reviews:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/query.cgi?component=Package%20Review&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced&short_desc=rubygem-&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/query.cgi?component=Package%20Review&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced&short_desc=rubygem-&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr</a><br>
<br>
Or you can search Fedora's package-review ML.<br>
<br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid:5166A5F9.6040206@archlinux.gr" type="cite">
<blockquote cite="mid:516695FB.7030009@redhat.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt> And also, please note that you
are listing also the development dependencies, such as
Spork. Spork is no way needed for run-time nor build-time.
It is pure development tool, which allows you to run your
test suite as soon as you save some changes. We should
eliminate such gems from the list. Not that we don't want
them in Fedora, but just because they are out of scope for
this project IMO.</tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt><tt> Vít</tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt></div>
</blockquote>
<tt>oops, you're right. I'</tt><tt>ll exclude devel packages as
well.</tt><tt><br>
Nice catch :) I didn't take the Gemfile into account, that's <br>
why it ended up listing these deps.<br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt></blockquote>
<br>
Some of development packages are needed to run test suite during
package builds, which is always good idea, so be careful.<br>
<br>
<br>
Vít<br>
</body>
</html>