<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt>On 04/11/2013 01:52 PM, Vít Ondruch
wrote:</tt><tt><br>
</tt></div>
<blockquote cite="mid:516695FB.7030009@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt>There are some of them already
undergoing review:</tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt><tt> awesome_print - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839650">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839650</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> backports - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816991">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816991</a></tt><tt>
- though I am not sure if we should continue with this one,
since it brings nothing new to Fedora</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> bootstrap-sass - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920436">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920436</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> faraday - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820063">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820063</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> rails_best_practices - </tt><tt><a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839649">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839649</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> ruby-progressbar - There is rubygem-progressbar, which
seems to be the same library: </tt><tt><a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642666">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642666</a></tt><tt>
there was also rubygem-ruby-progressbar review: </tt><tt><a
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737551">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737551</a></tt><tt>
- Although this one was deferred, not sure if we should not
name the gem by upstream</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> spork - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588476">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588476</a></tt><tt>
- This was deferred</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> stringex - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728051">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728051</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> yajl-ruby - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823351">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823351</a></tt><tt>
- This is blocked by upstream a bit :/</tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt></div>
</blockquote>
<tt>Are these listed somewhere, or you manually search for them?</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid:516695FB.7030009@redhat.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt> And there are some which are in
Fedora already:</tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt><tt> facter - </tt><tt><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/facter">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/facter</a></tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt></div>
</blockquote>
<tt>Ah yes, I searched only packages that contained the rubygem
prefix. I'll fix that.</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid:516695FB.7030009@redhat.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt> And also others, which are not
yet in Fedora, but they are packaged by their upstream, such
as Foreman. The Katello Koji instance [1] might be good source
for packages like that. Katello guys are eager to get their
dependencies into Fedora as far as I know.</tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt><tt> Some of them should not be needed at all:</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> libv8 - This is used by therubyracer as far as I know.
The system libv8 is used for therubyracer instead and if there
is other need, it should be used there as well.</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt> rb-fsevent - This is Mac specific gem. It is useless
on Linux. And that is exactly the thing which is problematic
for collaboration with Ruby community :/ It is very probably
dependency of Spork, so it should not be needed anyway. In the
worst case, Spork can use polling by default.</tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt></div>
</blockquote>
<tt>Thanks for the koji link, I'll check it.</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt>
<blockquote cite="mid:516695FB.7030009@redhat.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><tt> And also, please note that you
are listing also the development dependencies, such as Spork.
Spork is no way needed for run-time nor build-time. It is pure
development tool, which allows you to run your test suite as
soon as you save some changes. We should eliminate such gems
from the list. Not that we don't want them in Fedora, but just
because they are out of scope for this project IMO.</tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt><tt> Vít</tt><tt><br>
</tt> <tt><br>
</tt></div>
</blockquote>
<tt>oops, you're right. I'</tt><tt>ll exclude devel packages as
well.</tt><tt><br>
Nice catch :) I didn't take the Gemfile into account, that's <br>
why it ended up listing these deps.<br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt><tt><br>
</tt>
</body>
</html>