<div dir="ltr">+1<div><br></div><div>fedora-ruby makes perfect sense to me. Although some might be tempted to use the name fedora-ruby-sig, the "sig" acronym is not widely understood in my experience.<br><div><br>
</div><div>-Dan</div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Josef Stribny <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jstribny@redhat.com" target="_blank">jstribny@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">As I said before, I would welcome the common namespace. I believe it's a good opportunity to promote Fedora Ruby SIG and our contributions. As for the name, I don't see a problem with 'fedora-ruby'.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Josef<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
From: "Achilleas Pipinellis" <<a href="mailto:axilleaspi@ymail.com">axilleaspi@ymail.com</a>><br>
To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <<a href="mailto:ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org">ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org</a>><br>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 5:28:44 PM<br>
Subject: Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects<br>
<br>
I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own<br>
discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is.<br>
<br>
Some already raised points:<br>
<br>
1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already<br>
taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these.<br>
Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under<br>
this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you,<br>
Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full<br>
ownership.<br>
<br>
2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their<br>
rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights<br>
unfortunately but we'll figure it out.<br>
<br>
Projects that could share the namespace:<br>
<br>
1. gem2rpm [1]<br>
2. rubypick [2]<br>
3. pkgwat [3]<br>
4. gem-compare [4]<br>
5. isitfedoraruby [5][6]<br>
<br>
So, what do you think?<br>
<br>
--------<br>
<br>
[0] <a href="https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50" target="_blank">https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50</a><br>
[1] <a href="https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm" target="_blank">https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm</a><br>
[2] <a href="https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick" target="_blank">https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick</a><br>
[3] <a href="https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat" target="_blank">https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat</a><br>
[4] <a href="https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare" target="_blank">https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare</a><br>
[5] <a href="https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby" target="_blank">https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby</a><br>
[6] <a href="https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby" target="_blank">https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby</a><br>
<br>
--<br>
FAS : axilleas<br>
GPG : 0xABF99BE5<br>
Blog: <a href="http://axilleas.me" target="_blank">http://axilleas.me</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ruby-sig mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org">ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ruby-sig mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org">ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">
<div>Dan Allen | <a href="http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen" target="_blank">http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a></div></div>
</div>