Fwd: Secandary architecture proposal ... parisc

[Oliver Falk]

Dennis Gilmore schrieb:
> On Tuesday 31 March 2009 12:54:29 pm Jan Chadima wrote:
>> ----- "Mike McGrath" <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Jan Chadima wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>> we want to make secondary fedora architecture on HP parisc. We have
>>> built some rpms on an old hp workstation now. We try to port the
>>> architecture dependent ones. We plan to be able boot from cd in an
>>> month or two. The project page is
>>> http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/?path=fedora-parisc
>>>
>>>> . We want to invite another developers to contribute.
>>>>
>>>> Now we are only two, we want to organize a Fedora SIG and if
>>> possible Fedora secondary architecture.
>>>
>>>> Could you please point me to some information how to do it or
>>> document how to do it?
>>>
>>>> Thanx in advance
>>>> Jan F. Chadima
>>>> Ales Snuparek
>>> Your best bet on secondary arch discussions is on the secondary arch
>>> list.
>>> Take a look at:
>>>
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-secondary-list
>>>
>>> 	-Mike
> hi Jan,
> 
> Welcome to fedora :)   please read through 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures   and add a parisc arch page  
> with the info for you and your team.  if you have not setup a arch tracker bug 
> in bugzilla, please do. 

Ooops. We should merge the Architectures page with this:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ArchTeam

> Right now the documenatation for getting everything up and running is pretty 
> scattered.  I need to sit down and write it up in the wiki.  you will need 
> koji 1.3.1 and rpm 4.6.0 on your builders and hub.  We do require that the hub 
> be publically accessible.  we will setup dns for you 
> parisc,koji.fedoraproject.org  and ill add to fedora-packager-setup to write 
> out koji configs for parisc.
> 
> Do you have any specific questions right now?

You might also want to read my note here: http://buildsys.zero42.at/ (HPPA).

I have some C3750 here, that does.... Actually it's only here for the 
dust :-) Might be a bit faster than what you currently have.

-of