[refpolicy] [PATCH] revise roles/dbadm.te (Re: dbadm.pp is not available in selinux-policy package)

[KaiGai Kohei]

(2010/08/18 3:00), Chris PeBenito wrote:
> On 08/16/10 19:37, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> (2010/08/17 4:42), Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>>> On 08/16/10 05:11, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>>>> Sorry for this long silent on the topic.
>>>>
>>>> IIRC, we have already agreed most part of the patch, haven't we?
>>>>
>>>> - The dbadm_t domain shall be launched via sudo, not a login shell,
>>>> so, userdom_base_user_template() is used to grant basic privileges
>>>> to dbadm_t instead of userdom_unpriv_user_template().
>>>> - It allows too much privileges to dbadm_t, if we allows him to launch
>>>> setfiles, so we removed seutil_domtrans_setfiles().
>>>>
>>>> Did we have any more issues?
>>>>
>>>> The attached patch is same as the last version except for it was 
>>>> rebased
>>>> to the latest reference policy.
>>>
>>> I only have two issues:
>>>
>>> 1. Why should dbadm be allowed to set enforce mode?
>>
>> It uses selinux_get_enforce_mode(), not selinux_set_enforce_mode().
>> We just allow dbadm_t to see the current working mode.
> 
> My mistake, I misread it. You're right, its fine.
> 
>>> 2. Why does dbadm need to manage generic locks?
>>
>> It was originally copied from webadb.te, but PostgreSQL also makes
>> its lockfile on the /var/lock/subsys/postgresql. If server process
>> unexpectedly crashed, dbadm_t need to remove it by hand, doesn't it?
> 
> Based on what I see in the policy, my guess is this file is created by 
> the init script, right? If not, then it sounds like PostgreSQL needs a 
> lock type.
> 
Yes, this file is created by the init script.

In addition, postgresql_lock_t is defined, but type_transition rule is
defined on a pair of postgresql_t and var_lock_t, so the lockfile shall
be labeled as var_lock_t.

  [root at saba ~]# ls -Z /var/lock/subsys/postgresql
  -rw-r--r--. root root dbadm_u:object_r:var_lock_t:s0   /var/lock/subsys/postgresql

Maybe, init script should relabel it to postgresql_lock_t, ideally?

> I'd rather it just have delete permissions, rather than full manage 
> permissions. Something like files_delete_all_locks(), but for var_lock_t 
> instead.
> 
I tried to define files_delete_generic_locks(), instead of the manage.

Thanks,
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai at ak.jp.nec.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: refpolicy-dbadm-revise.4.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3441 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/selinux/attachments/20100818/1de3086e/attachment.bin