back to svn]

[Dominick Grift]

On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 11:28 -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:

> And here's my complaint: why should it tell me that it's unlabeled_t,
> rather than telling me "system_r is an invalid role"?
> 

Good point, would be nicer if it would not allow one to change to
invalid identifiers in the first place.

I cannot answer the question why one is allowed to chcon -r system_r
<file> in the first place. (might be some technical limitation)

However the unlabeled isid and unlabeled_t sid are there for fail-over
so that security is not compromised if it does happen