<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type" />
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
Hi, <br />
<br />
"Dan Horák" <dan@danny.cz> hat am 23. November 2009 um 14:29 geschrieben:<br />
> the new layout looks really better then my original, but I have few<br />
> items for discussion:<br />
<br />
Thats good to know<br />
<br />
> - the X/GUI column needs some explanation what it exactly means<br />
<br />
Yeah, thats really true. But dont know how to go the middle way between too much information and too less. I think the easiest way is to explain it in every section.<br />
<br />
> - would be nice to have information about all live releases (like F11<br />
> and F12) and rawhide, probably by creating 3 sub-lines for every package<br />
<br />
Well,<br />
that i think we should put on an seperate page wich describes the service. If you see MySQL is currently linked on the package page, i think we could link it to an Server_Overview_<service> page which tells more on the versions in the last two (so f12, f11 currently) releases. <br />
But i really do not know if this would be to much pages. <br />
So maybe we split i into Packages (Mysql, etc) or we better split into services (Databases etc.)  <br />
<br />
> - column for notes, useful for example in dnsmasq - "only dbus-libs<br />
> required, dbus itself can be stopped"<br />
<br />
okay, <br />
but for one services (package) this would work, dont know how it would look like if other packages come around.<br />
<br />
> Dan<br />
> <br />
> > kind regards<br />
> > Jörg<br />
<br />
</body>
</html>