<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Kevin Fenzi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kevin@scrye.com" target="_blank">kevin@scrye.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
<br>
Are we planning a netinstall iso type thing thats the bare needed to<br>
run yum to install other packages? (This may be something the base<br>
group makes?)<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I absolutely think this is something we should focus on. From the CentOS side, we have a ton of interest in our minimal iso. There are a number of folks who use it in conjunction with puppet/cfengine to deploy things. This may potentially bleed into (or overlap with ) the cloud sig folks. </div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Are we planning an install dvd that asks folks what to install from a<br>
list of things we ship on the dvd (and optionally the net)?<br>
<br>
Do we make a livecd type image that has a curated selection of server<br>
services we want that can be used live or installed?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Is there a use case for a livecd server setup? There's probably something for this, but I'm interested in what others think. </div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I realize it's somewhat backwards to think about deliverables before we<br>
have fully thought of what we are shipping and to who, but short term I<br>
don't know that we have a lot of options and narrowing that down might<br>
help narrow down other things. Of course longer term we could implement<br>
any sort of deliverable we have time/energy to do.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don't think it's overly backwards. A minimal iso etc is some low-hanging fruit we could get done early while we work on the rest. </div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Speaking only for myself, in the enterprise area, something like the<br>
netinstall iso with just enough stuff to install further stuff would be<br>
what I would use. For home use, it's nice to have something that works<br>
from usb, I could see using most any kind of image there. I've<br>
personally not burned a DVD in many years.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Agreed. Most deployments I've seen these days are pxe, netinstall, or usb. Alternately we could push the boot.fedora bits as well. </div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>-- <br>During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.<br>George Orwell
</div></div>