Gerald Henriksen (ghenriks at rogers.com) said: > My next question would be why is including a second older compiler > necessary? I could understand it for the transition to 2.96, and then > to 3.2, but why is it necessary from 3.2.* to 3.3? The kernel is not quite ready to be compiled with gcc-3.3, although it should be getting pretty close at this point. Bill