TeXlive installation failure, TeXlive update breaks the TeX installation
Matthew Saltzman
mjs at clemson.edu
Thu Apr 22 22:10:45 UTC 2010
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 21:33 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 02:58:51PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 19:56 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > > Hi Matt,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:29:32AM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 10:16 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:00:21PM -0400, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > > > > > Suggestions welcome (in fact, desired desperately!). This is
> > > > > > mission-critical for me. Should I use the QRPATHS bitmask?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You can use chrpath(1) to remove RPATHs like:
> > > > > chrpath -d ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/*.so ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir}/*
> > > >
> > > > At what point should I do that? Should I add it to the evince spec file
> > > > someplace?
> > >
> > > Yup, at the end of the %install section.
> >
> > Or in this case:
> >
> > chrpath -d ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/*.so ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/nautilus/extensions-2.0/*.so ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/evince/1/backends/*.so ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir}/*
> >
> > Is this a bug that should be 'zilla'ed?
>
> Definitely.
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Beware_of_Rpath
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584969
>
> Cheers,
> Jindrich
>
--
Matthew Saltzman
Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
More information about the test
mailing list