Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Bug Review Meeting 2010-08-06 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST/9 AM PST)

[James Laska]

On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:57 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 08/06/2010 10:16 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > 620211 :: NEW :: python-psyco :: konrad at tylerc.org :: python-psyco needs
> > porting to python 2.7 in F14 and devel ::
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620211
> 
> Does anything actually depend on this?

It's part of the Alpha release criteria [1] that no deps or conflicts
are present on physical media (DVD/CD).  This seems to have slipped
through through first scrubbing of the list yesterday.

        No file conflicts or unresolved package dependencies during a
        media-based (CD/DVD) install 

If nothing pulls this into an install transaction on DVD/CD, and it
isn't listed in comps.xml, should it be removed from the media?  

Also, the package is only included in the i386 DVD, not the x86_64
DVD ... not sure why.

Thanks,
James

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20100806/e481b5d1/attachment.bin