Announcing ProvenTesters Policy
awilliam at redhat.com
Thu Jun 3 19:10:18 UTC 2010
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 15:00 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> We've also been accumulating group membership requests. Are we ready to
> start processing these requests?
I guess one thing we should agree on first is what we will be 'teaching'
our applicants. =)
I think so far we've informally wound up working on this logic:
1. We're expected to review 'critical path' updates
2. The 'critical path' definition is about being able to boot the
system, start a graphical desktop, and do updates
3. Therefore we ought to be looking at whether the packages contain
regressions which break these: we should look at updates from the
perspective of whether they prevent us from carrying out critical path
is that roughly accurate, for a first cut?
Alternatively, we could use the release criteria, and check that updates
don't introduce regressions which would infringe the release criteria.
This is effectively a superset of the first option, as part of what the
release criteria enforce is the critical path functionality.
(Boy, the grammar in this post is horrible!)
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the test