2010-03-19 - F-13 Beta Blocker Meeting Recap

James Laska jlaska at redhat.com
Mon Mar 22 12:54:01 UTC 2010


Greetings,

The second scheduled [1] Fedora 13 Beta blocker bug review [2] was held
last Friday.  The F13Beta blocker list [3] was reviewed and each bug was
evaluated against the beta release criteria [4].

Thanks to all who helped move the meeting along.  A meeting recap is
attached and available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-03-19/f13beta-blocker-review.2010-03-19-16.04.html

Thanks,
James

[1]
http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-13/f-13-quality-tasks.html
[2] Say this five times fast
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=F13Beta
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria

-------------- next part --------------
==========================================
#fedora-bugzappers: F13Beta-blocker-review
==========================================


Meeting started by jlaska at 16:04:44 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-03-19/f13beta-blocker-review.2010-03-19-16.04.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* Gathering critmass  (jlaska, 16:05:15)

* Gathering crit-mass  (jlaska, 16:08:35)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574748  (adamw, 16:18:02)
  * adding this to F13Beta for discussion whether this bug affects the
    Alpha  (jlaska, 16:18:25)
  * IDEA: Target bugs can be included in a crit-path package update, but
    at least one Blocker bug must also be present?  (jlaska, 16:21:48)
  * AGREED: 574748 drops from blocker list, it's not severe enough
    (adamw, 16:24:05)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574743  (adamw, 16:24:15)
  * AGREED: 574743 will be an easy fix. blocker status uncertain but not
    worth investing time in discussing  (adamw, 16:30:14)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572489  (adamw, 16:30:27)
  * LINK:
    http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-March/089140.html
    (jlaska, 16:32:33)
  * AGREED: 572489 was agreed not to be a blocker last week but bugzilla
    was not updated; we will update bugzilla this week  (adamw,
    16:34:59)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570302  (adamw, 16:35:04)
  * AGREED: we do not have enough information to fully evaluate 570302,
    will ask for further information from hans on the bug  (adamw,
    16:42:19)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569377  (adamw, 16:43:24)
  * AGREED: 569377 is a blocker, clumens to poke pjones about it
    (adamw, 16:49:44)
  * ACTION: clumens to poke pjones to take action on 569377  (adamw,
    16:49:54)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539904  (adamw, 16:50:56)
  * IDEA: non-english languages are not represented in the current
    installer matrix (both graphical or text-mode)  (jlaska, 16:54:00)
  * AGREED: 539904 is a blocker, a patch is in the bug, clumens is
    checking it  (adamw, 16:55:46)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505189  (adamw, 16:56:02)
  * LINK:
    http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=anaconda.git;a=commit;h=f8c1f662b5195805d5fbde60c6593909cd8f4395
    (jlaska, 17:00:17)
  * AGREED: 505189 is not quite a blocker, but nice to have, and the fix
    is simple: we will probably take it into beta  (adamw, 17:03:27)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567346  (adamw, 17:04:18)
  * AGREED: 567346 requires more information; hughsie believed it was
    fixed in latest gnome-packagekit but adamw is still experiencing.
    blocker status unclear but leaving on list at least until next week
    (adamw, 17:22:28)
  * ACTION: adamw to talk to hughsie about 567346 and try to diagnose
    (adamw, 17:22:39)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568106  (adamw, 17:22:47)
  * ACTION: jlaska will attempt to reproduce 568106 on bare metal
    (jlaska, 17:30:40)
  * AGREED: 568106 blocker status uncertain, leaving on the list to
    discuss again next week after further testing  (adamw, 17:32:56)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533746  (adamw, 17:34:19)
  * AGREED: 533746 is blocker-y due to the large amount of systems
    affected, a fix is in progress and linville is hopeful it can land
    early next week in time for beta rc1  (adamw, 17:46:34)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=566425  (adamw, 17:46:50)
  * AGREED: 566425 is a blocker, jlaska will co-ordinate with cole to
    get a fixed package downstream in time for beta rc period  (adamw,
    17:51:37)
  * ACTION: jlaska to co-ordinate with crobinson to get a new libvirt
    package in  (adamw, 17:51:56)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559290  (adamw, 17:52:09)
  * LINK:
    http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f12/en-US/html/index.html#sect-Release_Notes-Hardware_Requirements
    (jlaska, 17:56:11)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499585   (adamw,
    17:56:24)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Documentation_Beats_Hardware_Overview
    looks like the beat  (adamw, 17:59:42)
  * ACTION: jlaska will update 559290 given that it appears the reporter
    problem is resolved  (jlaska, 18:02:00)
  * AGREED: 559290 looks fixed, jlaska to update bugzilla  (adamw,
    18:02:11)
  * AGREED: discussion on hardware requirements documentation to move to
    499585  (adamw, 18:02:21)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=572215  (adamw, 18:02:45)
  * jforbes directed jlaska to a new qemu package in f12 updates-testing
    (qemu-0.12) that resolved the issue  (jlaska, 18:04:05)
  * ACTION: jlaska will follow-up w/ jforbes to determine next steps for
    bug 572215  (jlaska, 18:08:00)
  * AGREED: 572215 is a blocker, the fact that the broken code is in f12
    makes tracking tricky. a fixed package is available but has other
    problems. will monitor and discuss again next week  (adamw,
    18:08:05)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574596  (adamw, 18:08:19)
  * AGREED: 574596 is a blocker, fix is available for testing, oxf13
    will test it today  (adamw, 18:12:37)
  * ACTION: group to consider adding firstboot release criteria for f14
    / f13 final  (adamw, 18:12:48)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573868  (adamw, 18:12:59)
  * AGREED: 573868 may be a final rather than beta blocker, but the fix
    is available and tested and we will pull it into the beta if it is
    pushed to f13 stable in time  (adamw, 18:18:54)

Meeting ended at 18:26:33 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* clumens to poke pjones to take action on 569377
* adamw to talk to hughsie about 567346 and try to diagnose
* jlaska will attempt to reproduce 568106 on bare metal
* jlaska to co-ordinate with crobinson to get a new libvirt package in
* jlaska will update 559290 given that it appears the reporter problem
  is resolved
* jlaska will follow-up w/ jforbes to determine next steps for bug
  572215
* group to consider adding firstboot release criteria for f14 / f13
  final




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* adamw
  * adamw to talk to hughsie about 567346 and try to diagnose
* clumens
  * clumens to poke pjones to take action on 569377
* jlaska
  * jlaska will attempt to reproduce 568106 on bare metal
  * jlaska to co-ordinate with crobinson to get a new libvirt package in
  * jlaska will update 559290 given that it appears the reporter problem
    is resolved
  * jlaska will follow-up w/ jforbes to determine next steps for bug
    572215
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * group to consider adding firstboot release criteria for f14 / f13
    final




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (230)
* jlaska (186)
* Oxf13 (79)
* clumens (23)
* buggbot (21)
* linville (9)
* zodbot (7)
* nirik (5)
* dmalcolm (5)
* notting (5)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20100322/b8dc9614/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list